An SFG Analysis of Process Types in the Textbook English for Finance and Banking 2

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54855/979-8-9870112-8-7_5

Keywords:

SFL, ESP, textbooks, English for finance, process types

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the clause types in English for Finance and Banking 2 by Majorie Rosenberg (2012). Ten reading comprehension articles from the book are the sources of the statistics. Halliday and Mathiessen's transitivity system (2014) serves as the foundation for the theoretical framework for data analysis. The paper uses a qualitative descriptive method. The study's findings identify four main types of processes used in reading collections: material, mental, relational, and verbal. Therefore, it is recommended that English textbooks for specific purposes be written to ensure minimum linguistic standards in accordance with international norms.

Author Biography

Nguyen Thi Thanh Hoa, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Vietnam

Nguyen Thi Thanh Hoa is an Instructor of English at Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Vietnam. She has 18 years of teaching experience and has been actively involved in English language education at the tertiary level. Her research interests focus on Systemic Functional Linguistics and Systemic Functional Grammar, with further interests in Discourse Analysis, Register, Teaching English, Translation, Interpretation, TEFL, TESOL, and Contrastive Linguistics.

References

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cambridge University Press.

Fadiarachmanda, E. (2022). Exploring types of transitivity processes in Eighth-Grade English textbook “Bright.” Proceedings of the 3rd English Education Conference, 211–219.

Febriyanti, E. R. (2018). Investigating English Department Students' Perceptions about a Good English Language Teacher. International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 83-95. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1245073

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K(1985a). An Introduction to Functional Linguistics. London: Edward Arnold, 42.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Rouledge.

Hendrawan, W., Sujatna, E. T. S., Krisnawati, E., & Darmayanti, N. (2022). Didactic Oriented Study: Move and Transitivity Analysis of Method, Result, and Discussion Sections in Research Articles. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1259-1272. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1353047

Jayanti, W. M. M. (2020). Transitivity analysis in English textbook “Pathway to English.” Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(1), 45–56.

Kennedy, C., & Bolitho, R. (1984). English for Specific Purposes. Macmillan.

Khorina, O. (2020). Process types in mechanical engineering texts: Transitivity analysis. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 8, 15-22.

Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. Clare Painter Alnorld.

Nasution, L. (2023). Transitivity system in narrative texts for junior high school: A textbook-based study. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 17(2), 120–131.

Nikonova, E. I., Sharonov, I. A., Sorokoumova, S. N., Suvorova, O. V., & Sorokoumova, E. A. (2016). Modern Functions of a Textbook on Social Sciences and Humanities as an Informational Management Tool of University Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(10), 3764-3774. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1114692

Nguyen, T.T.H. (2020). Analysis of lexical collocational errors in essays committed by double-majored students at Hanoi National University of Education.VNU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 281-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/vjossh.v6i2.550.

Nurkholidah, E. S., Sutopo, D., & Widhiyanto, W. (2019). The Realization of Transitivity Systems in Undergraduate Learners’ Argumentative Essay Texts. English Education Journal, 9(4), 450-458.

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of English for specific purposes (Vol. 592). Boston: Wiley-blackwell.

Qasim, H. M. (2021). Ideational metafunction analysis of Pakistani English textbook for Grade 9. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(3), 15–24.

Rahmat, N. H. (2020). Investigating the cycle of fear in foreign language learning. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(1), 117-127

Rizkiani, F. (2018). A transitivity analysis of reading texts in an English textbook “When English Rings a Bell.” [Undergraduate thesis, State Islamic University of Sunan Gunung Djati]. UIN Repository.

Vathanalaoha, K., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2018). Genre Analysis of Experiment-based Dental Research Article Abstracts. Thai and International Journals. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 178-191, https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-01

Vu, T. K. L. (2013). Errors in Vietnamese English collocation translation made by students at International Studies (ULIS) (Bachelor’s thesis). Vietnam National University, University of Languages and Studies. Retrieved from http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/100019

Downloads

Published

08-12-2025

How to Cite

Nguyen, T. T. H. (2025). An SFG Analysis of Process Types in the Textbook English for Finance and Banking 2. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 7, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.54855/979-8-9870112-8-7_5

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.