Postgraduate EFL Students’ Use of Hedging Strategies in Academic Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.2454Keywords:
Hedging strategies, academic writing, discourse analysis, Postgraduate EFL studentsAbstract
In academic writing, hedging strategies help writers state uncertain scientific claims accurately, avoid personal responsibility and build better writer-reader relationships by addressing the need for deference and cooperation in gaining reader ratification. In Vietnam, little research investigates the hedging strategies employed by postgraduate students in academic writing. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate Vietnamese postgraduate students' use of hedging strategies in academic writing. The data were extracted from 30 written assignments in an academic writing course within a Master's program. The hedging strategies were analyzed and compared based on frequency, distribution, variety, and contextual use, employing Hyland's definition and taxonomy of hedging strategies. The findings revealed that postgraduate EFL students rely heavily on modal verbs, while nouns are the least favored. The findings suggest a need for further instructions and practice assignments on the use of hedging strategies in academic writing.References
Abdollahzadeh, E. (2019). A cross-cultural study of hedging in discussion sections by junior and senior academic writers: Un estudio transcultural. Ibérica, 38, 177–202. https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/97
Adrian, D., & Fajri, M. S. A. (2023). Hedging practices in soft science research articles: A corpus-based analysis of Indonesian authors. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2249630.
Babaii, E., Atai, M. R., & Mohammadi, V. (2015). Stance in English research articles: Two disciplines of the same science. Teaching English Language, 9(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2015.53730
Baker, Michael (2000a). “Editorial: Writing a Research Proposal”, The Marketing Review, 1(1), pp. 61-75.
Braine, G. (1989). Writing in science and technology: An analysis of assignments from ten undergraduate courses. English for Specific Purposes, 8(1), 3-15.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). An intercultural analysis of the use of hedging by Chinese and Anglophone academic English writers. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-2009
Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00007-0
Dang, T. H. N. (2024). EFL students’ perceptions of peer feedback in writing classes at a university in HCM city. International Journal of Language Instruction, 3(2),18-28. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24322
Fang, Z. (2021). Demystifying academic writing: Genres, moves, skills, and strategies. Routledge.
Ho, T. L. U. (2024). Problems with academic writing encountered by EFL postgraduate students at a university in the Mekong Delta. International Journal of Language Education, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24311
Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3
Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013002004
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399
Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 458–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262952
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1-35.
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. (1997). Writing a research proposal: The role of library anxiety, statistics anxiety, and composition anxiety. Library & Information Science Research, 19(1), pp. 5-33.
Pham, L. (2020). The role of hedges in academic speaking among Vietnamese undergraduate students. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 30(2), 45–62.
Reid-Searl, K and Happell, B. (2012). Supervising nursing students administering medication: A perspective from registered nurses." Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(13/14), pp. 1998-2005.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
Skelton, J. (1988). The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT Journal, 42(1), 37-43.
Thuy, T. N. T. (2018). A corpus-based study on cross-cultural Divergence in the use of hedges in academic research articles written by Vietnamese and native English-Speaking authors. Social Sciences, 7(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7040070
Tran, T. Q., & Tang, T. B. (2022). Hedging in the results and discussion section of English applied linguistics research articles by Vietnamese and foreign writers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1301.14
Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in Popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00007-6
Vo, T. T. M. (2022). EFL students’ attitudes towards teacher correction and peer correction in writing skills. International Journal of Language Instruction, 1(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.221113
Wang, X. (2022). Hedging in academic writing: Cross-disciplinary comparisons in the Michigan corpus of Upper-level Student papers (MICUSP).
Wang, S.-P., & Tatiana, K. (2016). Corpus research on hedges in linguistics and EFL journal papers. International Journal of Education, 9(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v9i1.3717
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tran The Phi, Le Ngoc An
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the picte the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceedings' published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal, or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this proceedings.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
