Students’ Perceptions of the Pros and Cons of Theme-based Instruction in English Classes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.2452

Keywords:

Theme-based learning, Pros and Cons, English classes, Vietnamese students

Abstract

Researchers have investigated theme-based instruction to guarantee the efficacy of language acquisition and disciplinary content in the modern educational setting. In light of this, this study aimed to examine social science students' perceptions of both the pros and cons of theme-based instruction in their English classes. To address the research issues, I used a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, such as questionnaires and interviews with 100 social science students at Vietnam National University regarding the use of theme-based learning in the classroom. According to research findings, students' attitudes towards this approach in the course were positive in relation to three key areas: disciplinary knowledge in the social sciences, language acquisition abilities, and learning attitude. Additionally, the research revealed some main challenges students faced when theme-based instruction was implemented in language classrooms, particularly the lack of social science knowledge and the habit of using the mother tongue during class. I hope these findings will serve as the foundation for strategies that best support social science students' English language learning.

Author Biography

Phan Thi Ngoc Le, University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam

Dr. Phan Thi Ngoc Le is currently an English lecturer at VNU University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi. Her research interests include English Linguistics, World Englishes, L1 transfer to L2, Language and Technology, English for specific purposes, Theme-based instruction, and Academic writing.

References

Adianingrum, E. K. (2017). Learner autonomy in language learning : English education students’ attitudes. Conference on Language and Language Teaching, 1999, 473-478.

Brinton, D., Snow, M., & Wesche, M. (2003). Content-based second language instruction. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (2017). The evolving architecture of content-based instruction. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (2nd ed., pp. 2–20). The University of Michigan Press.

Brown, H., & Bradford, A. (2017). EMI, CLIL, & CBI: Differing approaches and goals. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & H. Brown (Eds.), Transformation in language education (pp. 328–334). JALT. https://jalt-publications.org/node/4/articles/6058-emi-clil-cbi-differing-approaches-and-goals

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson.

Chaput, P.P. (1993). Revitalizing the traditional program. In Kreuger & Ryans (Eds.) Language and content: Discipline and content-based approaches to language study. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

Crandall, J., & Kaufman, D. (2002). Content-based instruction in higher education settings: Evolving models for diverse contexts. In J. Crandall & D. Kaufman (Eds.), Content-based instruction in higher education settings (pp. 1-12). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.

Cummins, J. (1992). Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In P. R. Amato and A. Snow (Eds.), The Multicultural Classroom: Readings for Content-Area Teachers (pp. 16-26). New York: Longman.

Davies, S. (2003). Content-based Instruction in EFL contexts. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(2). http://iteslj.org/Articles/davies-CBI.html

Dilek, D. (2007). Using a Thematic Teaching Approach Based on Pupil's Skill and Interest in Social Studies Teaching. History Education Research Journal, 7(1), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.18546/HERJ.07.1.02

García, O & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education, Palgrave Macmillan.

Genesee, F. (1994). Integrating language and content: Lessons from immersion. Educational Practice Report 11. http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/iscpubs/ncrcds11/epr11.htm

Harlacher, J. (2016). An educator’s guide to questionnaire development (REL 2016–108). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Central. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

Heo, Y. (2006). Content-based instruction. TESL Working Paper Series, 4(2), 25-32. https://www.hpu.edu/research-publications/tesol-working-papers/2006/06Heo_CBI.pdf

Kalolo, J. (2019). Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9778-3

Kavaliauskiene, G. (2004). Research into the Integration of Content-Based Instruction into the ESP Classroom. Journal of Language and Learning, 2(1), 136-150.

Le, T. P. (2021). Designing themes of biology in teaching science 6, general education curriculum 2018 to improve quality of learning. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(2), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4505

Lyster, R. (2018). Content-based language teaching. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315103037

Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2020). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002765

Nguyen, B. H. T. (2019). Building cross-curricular integrated themes taught by corner-based teaching at secondary school. Journal of Science and Technology, University of Da Nang, 17(4), 12-16.

Nguyen, T. T. H. (2021). Implementing Digital Techniques to Stimulate EFL Students' Engagement: A Case Study in Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 105–129. Retrieved from https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/81

Nguyen, T. N. T. (2022). A Review of Studies on EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of Tranglanguaging as a Pedagogical Approach. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(3), 324-331. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222322

Noviyanti, A. (2022). The use of theme-based teaching to improve the students' writing skills in SMKN 5 Selayar. A Pre-Experimental Research. Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.

Pan, G. (2022). Application of Theme-based Approach and Blended Teaching Model in College Medical English Teaching. Pacific International Journal, 5(3), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v5i3.197

Peng, C. (2022). Theme-Based Instruction in Chinese College English Listening Teaching: An Empirical Study. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(8). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i8.5335

Rivers, W. M. (1992). Communicating naturally in a second language. Theory and practice in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Shang, H. (2006). Content based instruction in the EFL literature curriculum. The Internet TESL Journal, 12(11). http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Shang-CBI.html

Sheffield, C., Clabough, J., & Ellis, K. R. (2022). The Benefits of Thematic Teaching through The Social Studies Trade Book Collaborative. National Council for the Social Studies.

Shibata, N. (2022). The effectiveness of theme-based instruction on Japanese university students’ lexical diversity in writing. Nagoya JALT Journal, 3(1), 78–105. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTCHAP.NAGOYA3.1-4

Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. M. (2019). Content-based instruction: What every ESL teacher needs to know. The University of Michigan Press.

Taherdoost, H. (2022). Designing a questionnaire for a research paper: A comprehensive guide to design and develop an effective questionnaire. Asian Journal of Managerial Science, 11(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2022.11.1.3087

Tran, N. T., & Nguyen, T. N. (2018). Theme-based teaching approaches to physics in high school. UED Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities & Education, 8(3B), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.47393/jshe.v8i3B.732

Velásquez-Hoyos, A. P. (2021). Theme-Based Teaching to Promote Oral Fluency in a University in Colombia. HOW, 28(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.28.2.555

Vo, T., Truong, D., & Nguyen, P. (2023). The impact of digital technology on content and language integrated learning in higher education: a systematic review of literature. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 3, 137-147. ISSN: 2834-0000. ISBN: 979-8-9870112-2-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.23311

Wadi, A. S., Wathoni, H., & Sulaiman, A. A. B. (2021). The Influence of Theme-Based Language Teaching toward Indonesian Students’ Reading Comprehension. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics (IJEAL), 1(3), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v1i3.1191

Wang, F., & Shen, Z. (2023). Research of Theme-based Teaching’s Effectiveness in English Language Education. The Educational Review, USA, 7(7), 962-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2023.07.020

Webb. S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.

Zhao, K., & Boonyaprakob, K. (2022). A Case Study of Chinese Students Learning Thai as a Foreign Language: Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(1), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222110

Zhou, X. & Mann, S. (2021). Translanguaging in a Chinese University CLIL Classroom: Teacher strategies and student attitudes. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.2.5

Downloads

Published

12-08-2024

How to Cite

Phan, T. N. L. (2024). Students’ Perceptions of the Pros and Cons of Theme-based Instruction in English Classes. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 5, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.2452