Students’ Perceptions of the Pros and Cons of Theme-based Instruction in English Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.2452Keywords:
Theme-based learning, Pros and Cons, English classes, Vietnamese studentsAbstract
Researchers have investigated theme-based instruction to guarantee the efficacy of language acquisition and disciplinary content in the modern educational setting. In light of this, this study aimed to examine social science students' perceptions of both the pros and cons of theme-based instruction in their English classes. To address the research issues, I used a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, such as questionnaires and interviews with 100 social science students at Vietnam National University regarding the use of theme-based learning in the classroom. According to research findings, students' attitudes towards this approach in the course were positive in relation to three key areas: disciplinary knowledge in the social sciences, language acquisition abilities, and learning attitude. Additionally, the research revealed some main challenges students faced when theme-based instruction was implemented in language classrooms, particularly the lack of social science knowledge and the habit of using the mother tongue during class. I hope these findings will serve as the foundation for strategies that best support social science students' English language learning.
References
Adianingrum, E. K. (2017). Learner autonomy in language learning : English education students’ attitudes. Conference on Language and Language Teaching, 1999, 473-478.
Brinton, D., Snow, M., & Wesche, M. (2003). Content-based second language instruction. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (2017). The evolving architecture of content-based instruction. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (2nd ed., pp. 2–20). The University of Michigan Press.
Brown, H., & Bradford, A. (2017). EMI, CLIL, & CBI: Differing approaches and goals. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & H. Brown (Eds.), Transformation in language education (pp. 328–334). JALT. https://jalt-publications.org/node/4/articles/6058-emi-clil-cbi-differing-approaches-and-goals
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson.
Chaput, P.P. (1993). Revitalizing the traditional program. In Kreuger & Ryans (Eds.) Language and content: Discipline and content-based approaches to language study. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
Crandall, J., & Kaufman, D. (2002). Content-based instruction in higher education settings: Evolving models for diverse contexts. In J. Crandall & D. Kaufman (Eds.), Content-based instruction in higher education settings (pp. 1-12). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Cummins, J. (1992). Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In P. R. Amato and A. Snow (Eds.), The Multicultural Classroom: Readings for Content-Area Teachers (pp. 16-26). New York: Longman.
Davies, S. (2003). Content-based Instruction in EFL contexts. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(2). http://iteslj.org/Articles/davies-CBI.html
Dilek, D. (2007). Using a Thematic Teaching Approach Based on Pupil's Skill and Interest in Social Studies Teaching. History Education Research Journal, 7(1), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.18546/HERJ.07.1.02
García, O & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education, Palgrave Macmillan.
Genesee, F. (1994). Integrating language and content: Lessons from immersion. Educational Practice Report 11. http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/iscpubs/ncrcds11/epr11.htm
Harlacher, J. (2016). An educator’s guide to questionnaire development (REL 2016–108). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Central. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
Heo, Y. (2006). Content-based instruction. TESL Working Paper Series, 4(2), 25-32. https://www.hpu.edu/research-publications/tesol-working-papers/2006/06Heo_CBI.pdf
Kalolo, J. (2019). Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9778-3
Kavaliauskiene, G. (2004). Research into the Integration of Content-Based Instruction into the ESP Classroom. Journal of Language and Learning, 2(1), 136-150.
Le, T. P. (2021). Designing themes of biology in teaching science 6, general education curriculum 2018 to improve quality of learning. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(2), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4505
Lyster, R. (2018). Content-based language teaching. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315103037
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2020). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002765
Nguyen, B. H. T. (2019). Building cross-curricular integrated themes taught by corner-based teaching at secondary school. Journal of Science and Technology, University of Da Nang, 17(4), 12-16.
Nguyen, T. T. H. (2021). Implementing Digital Techniques to Stimulate EFL Students' Engagement: A Case Study in Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 105–129. Retrieved from https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/81
Nguyen, T. N. T. (2022). A Review of Studies on EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of Tranglanguaging as a Pedagogical Approach. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(3), 324-331. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222322
Noviyanti, A. (2022). The use of theme-based teaching to improve the students' writing skills in SMKN 5 Selayar. A Pre-Experimental Research. Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
Pan, G. (2022). Application of Theme-based Approach and Blended Teaching Model in College Medical English Teaching. Pacific International Journal, 5(3), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v5i3.197
Peng, C. (2022). Theme-Based Instruction in Chinese College English Listening Teaching: An Empirical Study. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(8). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i8.5335
Rivers, W. M. (1992). Communicating naturally in a second language. Theory and practice in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Shang, H. (2006). Content based instruction in the EFL literature curriculum. The Internet TESL Journal, 12(11). http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Shang-CBI.html
Sheffield, C., Clabough, J., & Ellis, K. R. (2022). The Benefits of Thematic Teaching through The Social Studies Trade Book Collaborative. National Council for the Social Studies.
Shibata, N. (2022). The effectiveness of theme-based instruction on Japanese university students’ lexical diversity in writing. Nagoya JALT Journal, 3(1), 78–105. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTCHAP.NAGOYA3.1-4
Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. M. (2019). Content-based instruction: What every ESL teacher needs to know. The University of Michigan Press.
Taherdoost, H. (2022). Designing a questionnaire for a research paper: A comprehensive guide to design and develop an effective questionnaire. Asian Journal of Managerial Science, 11(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2022.11.1.3087
Tran, N. T., & Nguyen, T. N. (2018). Theme-based teaching approaches to physics in high school. UED Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities & Education, 8(3B), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.47393/jshe.v8i3B.732
Velásquez-Hoyos, A. P. (2021). Theme-Based Teaching to Promote Oral Fluency in a University in Colombia. HOW, 28(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.28.2.555
Vo, T., Truong, D., & Nguyen, P. (2023). The impact of digital technology on content and language integrated learning in higher education: a systematic review of literature. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 3, 137-147. ISSN: 2834-0000. ISBN: 979-8-9870112-2-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.23311
Wadi, A. S., Wathoni, H., & Sulaiman, A. A. B. (2021). The Influence of Theme-Based Language Teaching toward Indonesian Students’ Reading Comprehension. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics (IJEAL), 1(3), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v1i3.1191
Wang, F., & Shen, Z. (2023). Research of Theme-based Teaching’s Effectiveness in English Language Education. The Educational Review, USA, 7(7), 962-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2023.07.020
Webb. S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
Zhao, K., & Boonyaprakob, K. (2022). A Case Study of Chinese Students Learning Thai as a Foreign Language: Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(1), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222110
Zhou, X. & Mann, S. (2021). Translanguaging in a Chinese University CLIL Classroom: Teacher strategies and student attitudes. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.2.5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Phan Thi Ngoc Le
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the picte the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceedings' published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal, or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this proceedings.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
