Vietnamese Lecturers' Emotional Responses and Regulatory Strategies Towards AI in L2 Writing
Keywords:
Artifical Intelligence, L2 Writing, Emotion, Narrative frameAbstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly changed the picture of L2 writing teaching and learning. This qualitative study explores this emotional dichotomy, drawing data from interviews and narrative frames (Barkhuizen, 2014) with nine writing lecturers of English majors from five different universities in Ho Chi Minh City. Findings reveal that positive emotions, such as excitement and satisfaction, can be observed during lesson planning and content preparation. In contrast, negative feelings of frustration, anxiety, and being overwhelmed arose from concerns over academic integrity and the decline of students' critical thinking skills. To manage these challenges, teachers are developing strategies like requiring in-class, handwritten work, establishing clear AI usage policies, and blending AI suggestions with peer and teacher feedback. This research highlights the significant emotional labor in AI adoption and underscores the urgent need for professional development that equips teachers to navigate these new pedagogical and emotional demands.
References
Almaki, S. H., Mafarja, N., & Al Mansoori, H. M. S. (2025). Teacher well-being and use of artificial intelligence applications and tools: Moderation effects of leadership support in inclusive classroom. STEM Education, 5(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025006
Badger, M., López, N., & Nissen, C. F. R. (2026). The Impact of GenAI Chatbots on Student Learning in Higher Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Technology in Education, 9(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.5111
Barkhuizen, G. (2014). Revisiting narrative frames: An instrument for investigating language teaching and learning. System, 47, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.014
Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System, 36(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002
Benaissa, A. (2024). Teachers’ Emotional Engagement with Artificial Intelligence: The Case of Algerian EFL University Teachers. ATRAS Journal, 5(3), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.70091/atras/AI.22
Bui, T. T. G., Ngo, N. V. A., & Mai, D. H. (2025). Applying AI Tools to Enhance Argumentation Skills in Debate Activities for EFL Students. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(3), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25236
Dinh, T. T. T., & Nguyen, H. H. (2025). EFL Teachers’ Emotions about Using Artificial Intelligence Technologies in University Context: A Qualitative Study. HNUE Journal of Science Educational Science, 70(7), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0126
Do, T. B. T. (2025). Teachers’ Experiences and Perceptions of Using Chatgpt in Writing Instruction. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 41(1S (Special Issue)), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5473
Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Nguyen, H. H. (2026). Perspectives of EFL Teachers Toward the Influence of AI Writing Tools on Students’ Writing Content and Organization. Open Access, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/DOI:%2010.18870/hlrc.v16i1.1641
Seyri, H., & Ghiasvand, F. (2025). “Teaching is basically feeling”: Unpacking EFL Teachers’ perceived emotions and regulatory strategies in AI-Powered L2 speaking and writing skills instruction. Computers and Education Open, 8, 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100264
Shen, Y., & Guo, H. (2024). “I feel AI is neither too good nor too bad”: Unveiling Chinese EFL teachers’ perceived emotions in generative AI-Mediated L2 classes. Computers in Human Behavior, 161, 108429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108429
Tran, H. N., Le, T. T. N., & Tran, V. B. U. (2025). AI Tools in Learning Academic Writing: Benefits and Challenges for MA Students in the English Language Studies at the Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25215
Tran, Y. V., & Le, T. H. G. (2025). Evaluating ChatGPT’s Reliability in Grading Writing Assignments on the EOP Learning Platform. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 7, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.54855/979-8-9870112-8-7_1
Truong, C. Q., & Tran, T. M. H. (2024). The Effectiveness of ChatGPT in Students’ Practicing Writing Skills: A Study at HCM UPES. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 5, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.2459
Xu, G., Haratyan, F., & Tian, H. (2026). A 2025 systematic review of teacher emotion regulation and well-being: Implications for student engagement, learning outcomes, and professional development in EFL contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1715266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1715266
Yang, L., & Zhao, S. (2024). AI-induced emotions in L2 education: Exploring EFL students’ perceived emotions and regulation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108337
Zhao, J., Li, S., & Zhang, J. (2025). Understanding Teachers’ Adoption of AI Technologies: An Empirical Study from Chinese Middle Schools. Systems, 13(4), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13040302
Downloads
Citations
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Le Bao Ngoc

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the picte the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceedings' published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal, or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this proceedings.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.








