Developing Critical AI Literacy among Vietnamese EFL Students: Risk Awareness and Sustainable Generative AI Use
Authors
-
Nguyen Viet Khoa
Faculty of Foreign Languages, Hanoi University of Science and Technology
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6268-1708
Keywords:
Generative AI, critical AI literacy, risk awareness, EFL, learner autonomyAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools are increasingly integrated into English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning, raising concerns about over-reliance, skill erosion, and ethical use. While previous research has examined student adoption of GenAI, limited attention has been paid to how learners’ risk awareness moderates reliance and supports sustainable use, particularly in non-Western EFL contexts. This study reports on a mixed-methods study of 199 undergraduate and postgraduate students at two Vietnamese universities. Data were collected through an online survey and open-ended responses and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics alongside thematic analysis. The findings show that students who are aware of GenAI-related risks report significantly lower reliance on AI tools and greater confidence in independent task completion. Qualitative results further identify learner- and teacher-endorsed strategies for balancing benefits and risks. The study highlights critical AI literacy, grounded in risk awareness, as a key mechanism for sustainable and ethical GenAI integration in EFL education.
References
Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting selfregulated learning. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation (pp. 293–309). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783319392110_17
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Belshaw, D. (2014). The essential elements of digital literacies. Doug Belshaw. https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=bWizQEACAAJ
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842
Dao, L. T. N. (2026). Examining the impact of AI-assisted preparation on Vietnamese EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in English. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 9(2025), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.54855/979-8-9870112-9-4_6
Dang, T. M. T., & Norris, L. (2024). Vietnamese culture of learning and its implications for English language education. Tạp chí Khoa học & Công nghệ (Đại học Công nghiệp Hà Nội), 60(10), 97–103. https://jst-haui.vn/media/31/uffile-upload-no-title31709.pdf
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=gNh6QgAACAAJ
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2014). Questionnaires in second language research : Construction, administration, and processing. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. https://www.english-efl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/questionnaires-in-second-language-research.pdf
Farkaš, I. (2024). Transforming cognition and human society in the digital age. Biological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752024004833
Floridi, L. (2021). Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI. In L. Floridi (Ed.), Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 41–45). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783030819071_4
Galaczi, E., & Luckin, R. (2024). Generative AI and language education: Opportunities, challenges and the need for critical perspectives. In Cambridge University Press & Assessment (pp. 4–20). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/CPELE_Generative%20AI%20and%20Language%20Education%20Opportunities%20Challenges%20and%20the%20Need%20for%20Critical%20Perspectives_FINAL%20%281%29.pdf
Gruenhagen, J. H., Sinclair, P. M., Carroll, J., Baker, P. R. A., Wilson, A., & Demant, D. (2024). The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(100273), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100273
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications. https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=Cayp_Um4O9gC
Hsu, W., & Silalahi, A. D. K. (2024). Exploring the paradoxical use of ChatGPT in education: Analyzing benefits, risks, and coping strategies through integrated UTAUT and PMT theories using a hybrid approach of SEM and fsQCA. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(100329), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100329
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649509526885
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., & Stadler, M. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103(102274). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2023). Cognitive gain in digital foreign language learning. Brain Sciences, 13(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13071074
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Le, T. T. P., Quach, T. T. N., Pham, T. X. T., & Nguyen, D. L. (2025). A systematic review of how ChatGPT is perceived and utilized in EFL writing classes: Implications for Vietnam. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 16(1), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.2516115
Lee, S., Choe, H., Zou, D., & Jeon, J. (2025). Generative AI (GenAI) in the language classroom: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(1), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2498537
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge. https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=jDg-CgAAQBAJ
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage. https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=fjh2DwAAQBAJ
MOET. (2020). National foreign language project 2020. Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam. https://chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&docid=78437
Ngo, C.-L., Nguyen, T. T., & Nguyen, K. N. H. (2025). Critical thinking in the age of generative AI: Effects of a short-term experiential learning intervention on EFL learners. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 250522, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.250522
Nguyen, H. B., & Le, T. (2012). ICT in Vietnamese education: Development and challenges. In Technologies for Enhancing Pedagogy, Engagement and Empowerment in Education: Creating LearningFriendly Environments (pp. 160–171). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781613500743.ch014
Nguyen, H., Duy, V., & Pham, V. (2025). Bringing AI into teaching: Understanding Vietnamese teachers’ perspectives and pedagogical challenges. Başlık, volume112025(volume11issue3august2025), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.11.3.335
Nguyen, K. V. (2025). The use of generative AI tools in higher education: Ethical and pedagogical principles. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(3), 1435–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805025096071
Nguyen, L. T. T., Biebricher, C., & Ward, G. (2021). The intercultural dimension in English language teaching: Vietnamese university English teachers’ voices. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(6), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4691
Nguyen, M. N., & Trinh, T. H. (2023). Vietnamese tertiary students’ autonomy in learning English listening skills. Proceedings of VietTESOL International Convention 2022: Digital ELT: Approaches and Innovations, 3(2023), 1–23. https://proceedings.viettesol.org.vn/index.php/vic/article/view/94
Nguyen, P. H. (2024). Challenges Vietnamese EFL students faced when learning and meeting the requirements of B1 English language proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(3), 893–901. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1503.22
Nguyen, T. K. T., Nguyen, T. T. D., & Trinh, D. D. (2026). English majors’ and non-English majors’ perceptions and readiness for AI-Assisted learning in English language courses: An exploratory study. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 9(2025), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.54855/979-8-9870112-9-4_7
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2022). Learning to live with datafication: Educational case studies and initiatives from across the world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003136842
Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2017). Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444817000192
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=Ip7pDAAAQBAJ
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press. https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/should-robots-replace-teachers-ai-and-the-future-of-education/
Ta, T. B. L., & Nghiem, T. T. H. (2024). An experiment on applying mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in teaching speaking to non-English majors in offline classes at a university in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 40(3), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5224
Tang, X. (2025). L2 writing with AI: Perceptions and engagement of EFL learners in China. English Language Teaching, 18(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v18n2p68
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Zou, B., Wang, C., Yan, Y., Du, X., & Ji, Y. (2024). Exploring English as a foreign language learners’ adoption and utilisation of ChatGPT for speaking practice through an extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 689 – 704. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12658
Zhai, X., Zhao, R., Jiang, Y., & Wu, H. (2024). Unpacking the dynamics of AI-based language learning: Flow, grit, and resilience in Chinese EFL contexts. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 1 – 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090838
Downloads
Citations
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Viet Khoa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the picte the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceedings' published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal, or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this proceedings.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
