Literature Search Strategy with AI
Literature Search Strategy with AI
Design powerful queries using Boolean logic, keyword expansion, and inclusion/exclusion terms. Build search strings for Google Scholar and Scopus, then refine based on results. Includes conversation, reading, quiz, prompt examples, a two-speaker dialogue, a query builder lab, and an end-of-lesson problem-solving task.
Mic: Off
Tip: For best voice options, use Chrome/Edge. If voices don’t appear yet, click once on the page and wait 2–3 seconds.
1) Outcomes
By the end, you can…
- Turn a topic into a search concept model (Concept 1 AND Concept 2 AND context).
- Expand keywords with synonyms, variants, and related terms.
- Write Boolean strings for Google Scholar and Scopus (TITLE-ABS-KEY).
- Use inclusion/exclusion (NOT) terms safely.
- Refine queries based on noisy or narrow results.
AI safety rules
- AI suggests keywords; databases decide what exists.
- Don’t trust AI to “know” indexed coverage; verify by searching.
- Keep a search log: query, date, database, results count, adjustments.
- Avoid excluding too aggressively early (NOT can remove relevant work).
Workflow: Define concepts → expand keywords → build Boolean string → run search → inspect top 20 results →
refine (add phrases, limit fields, add NOT terms, use date/type filters).
2) Conversation (Search Strategy Coach)
Build a high-quality search string step-by-step: concepts → synonyms → Boolean → filters → exclusions.
Tip: Start broad with AND/OR groups. Add NOT only after you inspect irrelevant clusters in results.
3) Reading + Comprehension Quiz
Reading: Query design + keyword expansion (with AI support)
1 A literature search begins with clear concepts. Instead of searching with one long sentence, researchers break the topic into
two to four concepts and connect them using AND. For each concept, they create a group of synonyms connected by OR.
This approach improves recall while keeping the topic focused.
2 AI can help expand keywords by suggesting synonyms, related phrases, spelling variants, acronyms, and common terminology used in a field.
However, keyword lists must be checked against real results. If a term yields irrelevant items, it should be removed or used only in a specific field
such as title or abstract.
3 Boolean logic is essential. Parentheses control grouping, quotation marks support phrase searching, and truncation can capture variants (e.g., learn*).
Databases differ in syntax. Scopus often supports field searching (e.g., TITLE-ABS-KEY), while Google Scholar is less precise but good for broad discovery.
4 Inclusion and exclusion terms should be used strategically. Early in a search, exclusions can remove relevant studies by mistake.
A safer method is to run a broad search, inspect irrelevant clusters, then add NOT terms to remove those clusters. Document each change so your search
is transparent and repeatable.
5 A high-quality search strategy is iterative. Researchers adjust keywords, add phrase forms, restrict to fields, and apply filters (date, document type,
language). The goal is not “one perfect query,” but a set of well-documented queries that balance breadth (recall) and focus (precision).
Comprehension check (choose the best answer)
4) Search Toolkit (Boolean, synonyms, inclusion/exclusion)
Concept model (2–4 blocks)
Keyword expansion checklist
Boolean patterns (cheat sheet)
Inclusion/exclusion strategy
Example strings (Google Scholar vs Scopus)
5) Prompts + Examples (Copy & Adapt)
Use AI to propose synonyms and query variations, then validate by running searches and checking relevance.
Prompt 1 — Concept blocks + synonyms
Prompt 2 — Scopus string (TITLE-ABS-KEY)
Prompt 3 — Google Scholar strategy (broad + refine)
Prompt 4 — Inclusion/exclusion terms (safe NOT)
Mini example (topic → blocks → final string)
6) Listening (Two Google Voices) — “Broad first, refine later”
Listen to two researchers discussing keyword expansion, Boolean logic, and safe exclusion terms.
7) Query Builder Lab (No-code builder + export)
Enter your topic as concept blocks. The builder creates (1) a Google Scholar string and (2) a Scopus TITLE-ABS-KEY string.
Then you can copy a Safe AI prompt to generate refinements (phrases, synonyms, exclusions) based on real results.
A) Research topic
B) Concept blocks (one per box)
C) Refinement tools
Generated search strings
Google Scholar (broad)
Scopus (TITLE-ABS-KEY)
Safe AI prompt (refine keywords from real results)
8) Problem-solving (End-of-lesson task)
Scenario: You ran a Google Scholar search and got 42,000 results, many unrelated to education (e.g., medical chatbots).
Then you tried Scopus and got only 12 results (too narrow).
Your task: write a refinement plan and produce two improved queries:
Your task: write a refinement plan and produce two improved queries:
- Query A (Scholar): reduce noise using phrases + a careful NOT list.
- Query B (Scopus): increase recall using synonym expansion and fewer restrictions.
A) Refinement plan (4–8 bullets)
B) Your improved queries
C) Inclusion criteria (3 bullets)
D) Exclusion criteria (3 bullets)
Progress
0
Activities completed
0%
Average score
0
Checklist items used
Saved locally in your browser (local storage).
